You have permission to edit this article.
Reader comment: Work reporting requirements undermine Medicaid expansion

Reader comment: Work reporting requirements undermine Medicaid expansion

  • 3
Joyce Witzel


As a lifelong Idaho Republican, I cried with relief when Idaho voters expanded Medicaid. Having health coverage allows me to finally get care for my arthritis, which currently goes untreated. But now our state legislature is trying to cut back voter approved Medicaid expansion, and considering adding work reporting requirements. I’ve worked my whole life, and like many other Idahoans, these cuts to Medicaid jeopardize my ability to get my arthritis treated and stay healthy.

Work reporting requirements are not what Idahoans had in mind when, in bipartisan fashion, we voted by 61% to expand Medicaid. We voted for our friends, family and neighbors in the coverage gap to have coverage — not to have it taken away. Reporting requirements are expensive, will only cause confusion and massive coverage losses for people who critically need care. Take Adrian for example, a 40-year-old, who went to fill a prescription shortly after Arkansas implemented work reporting requirements to learn he no longer had Medicaid coverage. Until that point, he was not aware that he had to report his work hours on an ongoing basis to keep his coverage. Plus, work reporting requirements don’t help promote work. These requirements expand government bureaucracy and prevent hard-working people from getting the care they need to work and take care of themselves and their families. After Adrian couldn’t afford his prescription, his condition flared up—and he was ultimately fired from his job when he wasn’t healthy enough to come to work. The truth is, many jobs today are not 9-5 and don’t come with benefits like health insurance. I understand this first hand. I work retail, and the number of hours that I work isn’t always up to me. I’m hard working, but I will lose health coverage if my employer doesn’t schedule enough hours for me to meet the arbitrary work reporting requirements. Without insurance, I’ll be unable to afford treatment, which is going to affect my ability to work. This possibility is terrifying.

Reporting requirements undermine what Medicaid expansion was supposed to do and what we voted for: to provide coverage to hard-working Idahoans. Instead, they create an expensive bureaucratic system of monitoring that will drive more eligible people to lose their health coverage. Some people will lose coverage because they work more hours one week than they will the next, others because of a mistake on the mountains of paperwork that may get caught in the shuffle of red tape.

We need to rise above politics to do what’s right for our residents. The public comment period is open until September 22. Public hearings will be in Boise from 1-3 p.m. September 3 in the Lincoln Auditorium, Idaho Capitol Building and on Sept. 6 in the Joe R Williams Building. You can also call in over the phone to 1-877-820-7831, ext. 301388. Or submit your comment here: I call on every citizen of Idaho to have your voice heard and submit a public comment on these restrictions to Medicaid expansion.

Joyce Witzel is a lifelong Republican that lives with her husband in Kuna.


Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News