Other view: Court Ruling Sustains Obamacare, But Health Care of Millions Remains Threatened
OTHER VIEW

Other view: Court Ruling Sustains Obamacare, But Health Care of Millions Remains Threatened

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}

A U.S. appeals court last month declined to invalidate the Affordable Care Act, which has already been wounded by a decade of Republican undermining. By keeping what’s left of Obamacare alive, the court has granted a reprieve for the patients who rely on it.

But make no mistake: Millions of Americans with preexisting medical conditions are still threatened by the GOP’s continued campaign of destruction.

Former President Barack Obama’s signature policy was an imperfect solution to America’s health care crisis, but it addressed the key issue of preexisting medical conditions. Those with such conditions used to routinely be denied health insurance or could get it only at exorbitant rates.

To help insurance companies survive Obamacare’s money-losing requirement that they accept those patients, the program mandated that all Americans must buy health insurance, thus guaranteeing a large enough pool of healthy buyers to make it all work. A U.S. appeals panel struck down that mandate last month, ruling in a pending national lawsuit by Republican officials seeking to end the entire program.

Since the mandate had already been effectively removed by a Republican Congress, that part of the ruling has no practical impact. More important is that the court declined to invalidate the entire law, as plaintiffs were seeking, and instead sent it back to the lower courts for additional analysis. Which means some 20 million Americans who rely on the Affordable Care Act can stay insured for now. But they are still one ruling away from having to choose between forgoing medical care or going bankrupt.

The lawsuit was brought by 18 Republican state attorneys general — including Missouri’s Josh Hawley, now the state’s junior U.S. senator — in an attempt to get the courts to do what a Republican-controlled Congress was unable to, and destroy Obamacare. So much for the GOP’s supposed disdain for legislating from the bench. The plaintiffs offer no realistic suggestion as to how preexisting conditions would be covered without Obamacare.

With this suit, Republicans risk becoming that unfortunate dog who, after years of chasing cars, finally catches one. What, exactly, is the GOP going to tell those millions of Americans who, if the suit succeeds, would once again be forced to choose between poor health and poverty?

The philosophical underpinning of this malignant lawsuit is that health care is not a right but a commodity like any other. And if you can’t afford it, that’s life. Whether Republicans say it or not, voters next year should view that as an overarching GOP campaign slogan, and vote accordingly.

REPRINTED FROM THE ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH.

0
1
0
0
1

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

"You can still call me a liberal, and I won’t disagree. I am always looking at what’s new. If it seems like a better idea than what is currently being done, I’ll champion it. . . I will tell you that I can also be a traditional conservative."

If for a moment you’d like to think about something other than Covid-19, try this: The subject I’d ordinarily address around now in an even-numbered year, which is filings for Idaho office by candidates.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News