Decline in Hunting-license Sales Sinks Conservation Money

2012-02-23T02:00:00Z 2012-02-23T07:17:34Z Decline in Hunting-license Sales Sinks Conservation MoneyBy Andrew Weeks - Twin Falls Times-News
February 23, 2012 2:00 am  • 

TWIN FALLS • Hunting is a popular pastime in Idaho. It’s just not as popular as it used to be.

What does that mean for Idaho? Less revenue for outdoors programs.

Hunting license and tag sales have slowly declined over the past several years, according to data from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game.

“Fishing licenses have stayed relatively steady as far as the numbers of licenses sold,” regional conservation officer Gary Hompland said. “Most of that, from what we can tell, is because we’ve had some really good salmon and steelhead runs the last few years. ... What is really disconcerting is our hunting licenses, both resident and non-resident.

“When those sales start to slump, all of our programs that function primarily on a budget related to those sales are affected.”

Hompland has seen it firsthand with his own staff.

Open positions in conservation that used to be filled within a matter of weeks now are held open for months, he said, and some of his law enforcement officers sometimes are sent to help other divisions of the agency such as its fisheries program.

Kelton Hatch, the department’s regional conservation educator, said his hunter-education programs have not been affected much because of slumping sales, in large part thanks to its volunteer program. About 100 volunteers teach just hunter ed.

Brad Lowe, regional wildlife biologist, said he expects money for the department’s Access Yes! — a program designed to improve sportsmen’s access through private land to public land — will dwindle again this year, just as it has for the past three or more years.

“Unless we can cobble together some more grants,” Lowe said, noting that federal aid has helped to secure some long-term contracts.

Access Yes! is funded partially through super hunt sales, he said. Lowe won’t know his budget until June.

Nationwide, there were 19.1 million hunters in 1975, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. By 2006 that number had declined to 12.5 million, and by 2025 the number of hunters is projected to be 9.1 million.

The participation rate in hunting is about 1 out of every 20 people. The largest declines by state include Rhode Island (59 percent), California (38 percent) and Iowa (26 percent), according to the 2010 report.

Hompland said he believes there are a couple of reasons for the decline: a dour economy and the changing demographics of hunters.

“We’re not recruiting new hunters like we used to,” he said, noting that families nowadays are pulled in many directions; single-parent families might not be introducing kids to the outdoors like two-parent families used to. And new technology makes hunting for many people a quick and easy outing instead of an investment of time and energy in teaching their kids about going afield.

Fishing is another matter.

“We haven’t seen the same level of decline because resident salmon fishing has been pretty stable,” said regional fisheries manager Doug Megargle. “But we’re not sitting on our laurels. ... Idaho is not an anomaly.”

Megargle said something Fish and Game tries to do across the board is encourage people to get outdoors.

“We work really hard in trying to make it easy and fun for people to get involved,” he said. “We offer fishing clinics, hunting education classes, programs in schools.”

The department’s fishing trailer, for instance, shows up at family-friendly waters and puts a fishing pole in people’s hands. Novice anglers are even taught how to clean fish, Megargle said.

“We’re trying to do whatever we can to encourage folks to be outside, to be active, and take advantage of what Idaho has to offer.”

Copyright 2015 Twin Falls Times-News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Shusser
    Report Abuse
    Shusser - March 06, 2012 11:54 pm
    Out of state hunters are deserting Idaho because wolves have had such an impact on hunting success. Those hunters each spend thousands for a once in a year, or once in a decade hunting trip. They are going to Colorado where wolves are still scarce. That impact goes for Idaho hunters, also. Few people are interested in killing a wolf. That is strictly sport hunting with no return (who wants to eat a dog?).

    The truth behind the lie is that wolves never were endangered. There were more than 60,000 in Canada and Alaska when the Feds forced them into Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. Fish and Game is chocking on those dogs, and they deserve to. I'm glad that it is not just the hunters who are feeling the pain.
  2. RevSmoke
    Report Abuse
    RevSmoke - February 23, 2012 10:41 pm
    I will admit I am not an expert on this subject but does anyone else see a link to the wolf hunting and descease of hunting in Idaho? I love my dogs very much and open season on their direct ancestors, an intelligent species of animal, seems very wrong to me if they are not directly harming live stock.
  3. Nab0res
    Report Abuse
    Nab0res - February 23, 2012 10:59 am
    In 1975 A person or family could go to an erea and shoot whatever they wanted and take it home to eat. They were not told where they could and could not hunt. They were not restricted as to what sex they could harvest. There were not a time when you went to the mountains that you did not see large hurds of deer. Phesants and other game birds were everywhere you went.And then fish and game decided to manage our game. they restricted us to one sex of whatever game we wanted to hunt. they go to our hunting ereas and block roads so we cannot access places wher we like to hunt. Now you hardly ever see phesants or other game birds. In the mountains you hardly ever see deer tracks much less deer. Any fool should know that a species needs both sexes to multiply. Our game has been destroyd by management. Our hunting rules are so restricted along with lack of game that it is not worth it anymore. Why not capture what little game we have left and put them in soos so we can see them once in a while?
  4. Chels
    Report Abuse
    Chels - February 23, 2012 8:26 am
    Is anyone honestly surprised by this? My husband is an avid hunter, especially duck hunting, but the government has closed down so many great hunting spots and tried to control so much that people just don't want to deal with the hassle anymore. They make decisions about what we can and can't do and then when all those decisions backfire, they Whine and want to know what happened.. It's a little screwy to me????

Read the Terms of Use for

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

activate-button-3 FULL ACCESS

Ask Us!

Ask us a question and we'll email you an answer.

Follow the Times-News

Sign Up for Breaking News

Featured Businesses

Find more...

Ask Us!

Ask us a question and we'll email you an answer.